Re: [PATCH] can: m_can: reset IR_RF0L in message reception loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03.03.2021 08:08:09, Torin Cooper-Bennun wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:21:27PM +0100, Mariusz Madej wrote:
> > Message lost warning is reported in loop without interrupt reset. Besides
> > redundant log messages it may lead to serious performance problem, where
> > fifo gets full faster than next reception is scheduled by NAPI. This
> > patch fixes it.
> 
> Looking at the flow in m_can_rx_handler, it looks as though
> m_can_handle_bus_errors -> m_can_handle_lost_msg already handles message
> loss properly, and issues a netdev_err. I wonder whether we can remove
> the warning from m_can_do_rx_poll entirely:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> index 3752520a7d4b..d783c46cac16 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> @@ -501,9 +501,6 @@ static int m_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
>  	}
>  
>  	while ((rxfs & RXFS_FFL_MASK) && (quota > 0)) {
> -		if (rxfs & RXFS_RFL)
> -			netdev_warn(dev, "Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost\n");
> -
>  		m_can_read_fifo(dev, rxfs);
>  
>  		quota--;
> 

Looks good to me. Can you send a proper patch?

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux