Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: correct interrupt flags in examples

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/26/20 4:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> have the same meaning:
> 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW  = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> 
> Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
> logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
>   ACTIVE_LOW  => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
>   ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # for tcan4x5x.txt

Jakub, can you queue this patch for net/master?

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux