On 11/20/20 11:04 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > The naming of can_dlc as element of struct can_frame and also as variable > name is misleading as it claims to be a 'data length CODE' but in reality > it always was a plain data length. > > With the indroduction of a new 'len' element in struct can_frame we can now > remove can_dlc as name and make clear which of the former uses was a plain > length (-> 'len') or a data length code (-> 'dlc') value. > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the patch, my git rebase successfully worked without problems, however taking this patch. Thanks, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
