On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 20:38, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via > '$ref') and all possible properties and/or child nodes are not > explicitly listed in the schema with the '$ref'. > > This is in preparation to add a meta-schema to check for missing > 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties'. This has been a > constant source of review issues. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- [...] > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/amlogic,meson-mx-sdhc.yaml | 2 ++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml | 2 ++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ingenic,mmc.yaml | 2 ++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/owl-mmc.yaml | 2 ++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml | 2 ++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-pxa.yaml | 2 ++ > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/socionext,uniphier-sd.yaml | 2 ++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.yaml | 2 ++ For mmc: Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> [...] Kind regards Uffe
