On di, 21 jan 2020 20:28:51 +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > On 21/01/2020 19.54, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > >On di, 21 jan 2020 09:30:35 +0100, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > >>On ma, 20 jan 2020 23:35:16 +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > > > >>>But it is still open why dev->ml_priv is not set correctly in vxcan.c as all > >>>the settings for .priv_size and in vxcan_setup look fine. > >> > >>Maybe I got completely lost: > >>Shouldn't can_ml_priv and vxcan_priv not be similar? > >>Where is the dev_rcv_lists in the vxcan case? > > > >I indeed got completely lost. vxcan_priv & can_ml_priv form together the > >private part. I continue looking > > I added some more debug output: > > @@ -463,6 +463,10 @@ int can_rx_register(struct net *net, struct net_device > *dev, canid_t can_id, > spin_lock_bh(&net->can.rcvlists_lock); > > dev_rcv_lists = can_dev_rcv_lists_find(net, dev); > + if (!dev_rcv_lists) { > + pr_err("dev_rcv_lists == NULL! %p (%s)\n", dev, dev->name); > + goto out_unlock; > + } > rcv_list = can_rcv_list_find(&can_id, &mask, dev_rcv_lists); > > rcv->can_id = can_id; > > > and the output becomes: > > [ 1814.644087] bond5130: (slave vxcan1): The slave device specified does not > support setting the MAC address > [ 1814.644106] bond5130: (slave vxcan1): Error -22 calling dev_set_mtu > [ 1814.648867] bond5128: (slave vxcan1): The slave device specified does not > support setting the MAC address > [ 1814.648904] bond5128: (slave vxcan1): Error -22 calling dev_set_mtu > [ 1814.649124] dev_rcv_lists == NULL! 000000008e41fb06 (bond5128) > [ 1814.696420] bond5129: (slave vxcan1): The slave device specified does not > support setting the MAC address > [ 1814.696438] bond5129: (slave vxcan1): Error -22 calling dev_set_mtu > > So it's not the vxcan1 netdev that causes the issue but (sporadically!!) the > bonding netdev. > > Interesting enough that the bonding device bond5128 obviously passes the > > if (dev && dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN) > return -ENODEV; > test. > > ?!? Did you consider my hypothesis I sent you (at 20h22 tonight)? I don't personally understand all the locks around networking, but your observation acks my theory of race condition. > > Regards, > Oliver