Re: [RFC v3] c_can: improve latency and avoid packet loss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
I've been testing version 4 of this patch series on our product and it
looks good so far (only 1 packet loss at the beginning of each tests
after hours of run, which is insignificant). On my end, the 64 message
objects plus setting the TI chip's CPU frequency scaling/governor to
'performance' (from ondemand which apparently had issues)  made a huge
difference.

I'm assuming there is no other way to make the RX/TX split configurable?

Thanks,
Elenita

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:25 AM Kurt Van Dijck
<dev.kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> V3 is the 2nd attempt to omit KConfig values.
> patches 1..8 are still identical.
>
> I changed the order of 9,10,11 patches since V2
> so that I never need any KConfig values.
>
> Still open for remarks.
>
> Kurt
>



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux