Re: tcan4x5x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: tcan4x5x
From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:48:29 +0100
In-reply-to: <17034589-01c5-701b-e5c3-db8972c5ade0@ti.com>
References: <c16a87a4-5021-b25f-076c-18aa7b482baf@geanix.com> <17034589-01c5-701b-e5c3-db8972c5ade0@ti.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0



On 06/12/2019 13.56, Dan Murphy wrote:

I am not seeing this requirement in the data sheet. Maybe my data sheetis out of date.
Is that 700uS out of reset?


See section 8.3.8 RST Pin in tcan4550-q1.pdf :)

/Sean

References:
- tcan4x5x
  - From: Sean Nyekjaer
- Re: tcan4x5x
  - From: Dan Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: tcan4x5x
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: tcan4x5x: Make wake-gpio an optional gpio
Previous by thread: Re: tcan4x5x
Next by thread: Re: tcan4x5x
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Automotive Discussions] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [CAN Bus]

Powered by Linux