RE: [PATCH V2 0/4] can: flexcan: fixes for stop mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2019年11月27日 17:52
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@xxxxxxx>; mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] can: flexcan: fixes for stop mode
> 
> 
> 
> On 27/11/2019 10.48, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> > One more should confirm with you, you inserted a flexcan.ko after stop
> > mode activated without fix patch firstly, and then inserted a
> > flexcan.ko with fix patch. If yes, this could cause unbalanced
> pm_runtime_enabled. The reason is that firstly inserted the flexcan.ko would
> enable device runtime pm, and then you inserted flexcan.ko enable device
> runtime pm again.
> >
> > Could you please insert flexcan.ko with fix patch directly after stop mode
> activated?
> >
> Hi,
> 
> If I insert flexcan.ko with fix patch directly after stop mode activated, the
> unbalanced msg is not shown...
> I guess we are good then :)

Great, Thanks a lot!

Could you give your Test-by tag for this patch set? And then Marc could review this patch set.

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> /Sean




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux