Re: c_can/d_can driver question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

On do, 17 okt 2019 15:37:04 -0500, Elenita Hinds wrote:
> I pulled in the c_can patches from the for-kurt branch (63574e9 thru
> bf01f717) and tested on my device.
> The number of overruns are noticeably fewer; however, the overall
> system performance seems to have slowed down. For example,
> the console response and Bluetooth data rate are noticeably slower.

You now give more precedence to CAN and less to console etc. ?
> 
> I also noticed that while the number of overruns decreased, the number
> of errors increased:

You have an interesting setup. I suspect that the FIFO is filled, and
does drop messages, although that is recorded in the statistics?

Would you want to try branch c_can-v4.9 in github.com/kurt-vd/linux?
I improved the reception a bit, and increased the FIFO size.

Besides that, can you give more details about your system and your load?

Kind regards,
Kurt



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux