Re: [PATCH] c_can using rx-offload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c_can using rx-offload
From: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:50:45 +0200
In-reply-to: <1570614515-14765-1-git-send-email-dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Mail-followup-to: linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20191009074338.GA23530@x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be> <1570614515-14765-1-git-send-email-dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)

@Marc,

The series is based on can-next/c_can, the version under test is rebased
on can-next/for-kurt

References:
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] can: c_can/rx-offload
  - From: Kurt Van Dijck
- [PATCH] c_can using rx-offload
  - From: Kurt Van Dijck

Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/3] can: rx-offload: add skb queue for use during ISR
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] can: rx-offload: continue on error
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/3] can: rx-offload: add skb queue for use during ISR
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] c_can using rx-offload
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Automotive Discussions] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [CAN Bus]

Powered by Linux