On ma, 30 sep 2019 21:17:44 +0000, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: > Hello Kurt, > > On 9/30/19 9:30 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > > First patch will (try to) remove lost busoff conditions by not reading > > the status register wihtout pending status interrupt. > > This has ran for several weeks, and not produced any lost busoff (I'm > > not sure it would have issued a true positive in this time). > > I run this on a beaglebone-alike board. > > > > Next patch will tear c_can bottom halve isr out of napi so I can better control > > it's RT priority without affecting other napi handlers in the same softirq. > > > > Last patch will combine top and bottom halve isr in case of force irq threading > > like on an RT kernel. Having the irq split across 2 threads does not seem wise. > > I will have a better look at this, but can you also > look at https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg02302.html? I'll take a look. I had seen them pass by, but they slipped through. > It might solve part of your issue, but at least there is a > merge conflict there, I think.. > > Regards, > > Jeroen >
