> > IMHO we should always treat and use the > > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst as the reference and not SPDX > > proper who moves at its own pace and evolves its specs and license ids > > independently of where we stand in the kernel. > > If this is not right Doc patches are welcomed! > > In this is very specific case this has been discussed on list a few > > times. If I recall correctly Thomas also had an opinion on this... > > So you are correct and this should be for now: > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > That is correct, stick with that format/version for now please. OK, will fix.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
