Re: [PATCH 11/26] 9p: Use alternative invalidation to using launder_folio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Shouldn't this include a call to filemap_invalidate_inode? Is just
> removing launder_folio enough to do this?

Good point.  netfs_unbuffered_write_iter() calls kiocb_invalidate_pages() -
which uses invalidate_inode_pages2_range() to discard the pagecache.  It
should probably use filemap_invalidate_inode() instead.

David

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-cachefs+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx.




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]
  Powered by Linux