Re: [PATCH v2] NFS: Fix nfs_netfs_issue_read() xarray locking for writeback interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The loop inside nfs_netfs_issue_read() currently does not disable
> interrupts while iterating through pages in the xarray to submit
> for NFS read.  This is not safe though since after taking xa_lock,
> another page in the mapping could be processed for writeback inside
> an interrupt, and deadlock can occur.  The fix is simple and clean
> if we use xa_for_each_range(), which handles the iteration with RCU
> while reducing code complexity.
> 
> The problem is easily reproduced with the following test:
>  mount -o vers=3,fsc 127.0.0.1:/export /mnt/nfs
>  dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/nfs/file1.bin bs=4096 count=1
>  echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>  dd if=/mnt/nfs/file1.bin of=/dev/null
>  umount /mnt/nfs
> 
> On the console with a lockdep-enabled kernel a message similar to
> the following will be seen:
> 
>  ================================
>  WARNING: inconsistent lock state
>  6.7.0-lockdbg+ #10 Not tainted
>  --------------------------------
>  inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
>  test5/1708 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
>  ffff888127baa598 (&xa->xa_lock#4){+.?.}-{3:3}, at:
> nfs_netfs_issue_read+0x1b2/0x4b0 [nfs]
>  {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
>    lock_acquire+0x144/0x380
>    _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4e/0xa0
>    __folio_end_writeback+0x17e/0x5c0
>    folio_end_writeback+0x93/0x1b0
>    iomap_finish_ioend+0xeb/0x6a0
>    blk_update_request+0x204/0x7f0
>    blk_mq_end_request+0x30/0x1c0
>    blk_complete_reqs+0x7e/0xa0
>    __do_softirq+0x113/0x544
>    __irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120
>    irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20
>    sysvec_call_function_single+0x6f/0x90
>    asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1a/0x20
>    pv_native_safe_halt+0xf/0x20
>    default_idle+0x9/0x20
>    default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0
>    do_idle+0x2b5/0x300
>    cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40
>    start_secondary+0x19d/0x1c0
>    secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x18f/0x19b
>  irq event stamp: 176891
>  hardirqs last  enabled at (176891): [<ffffffffa67a0be4>]
> _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60
>  hardirqs last disabled at (176890): [<ffffffffa67a0899>]
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x79/0xa0
>  softirqs last  enabled at (176646): [<ffffffffa515d91e>]
> __irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120
>  softirqs last disabled at (176633): [<ffffffffa515d91e>]
> __irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120
> 
>  other info that might help us debug this:
>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>         CPU0
>         ----
>    lock(&xa->xa_lock#4);
>    <Interrupt>
>      lock(&xa->xa_lock#4);
> 
>   *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
>  2 locks held by test5/1708:
>   #0: ffff888127baa498 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#22){++++}-{4:4}, at:
>       nfs_start_io_read+0x28/0x90 [nfs]
>   #1: ffff888127baa650 (mapping.invalidate_lock#3){.+.+}-{4:4}, at:
>       page_cache_ra_unbounded+0xa4/0x280
> 
>  stack backtrace:
>  CPU: 6 PID: 1708 Comm: test5 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.7.0-lockdbg+
>  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39
> 04/01/2014
>  Call Trace:
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90
>   mark_lock+0xb3f/0xd20
>   __lock_acquire+0x77b/0x3360
>   _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x80
>   nfs_netfs_issue_read+0x1b2/0x4b0 [nfs]
>   netfs_begin_read+0x77f/0x980 [netfs]
>   nfs_netfs_readahead+0x45/0x60 [nfs]
>   nfs_readahead+0x323/0x5a0 [nfs]
>   read_pages+0xf3/0x5c0
>   page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1c8/0x280
>   filemap_get_pages+0x38c/0xae0
>   filemap_read+0x206/0x5e0
>   nfs_file_read+0xb7/0x140 [nfs]
>   vfs_read+0x2a9/0x460
>   ksys_read+0xb7/0x140
> 
> Fixes: 000dbe0bec05 ("NFS: Convert buffered read paths to use netfs when
> fscache is enabled")
> Suggested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-cachefs+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx.




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]
  Powered by Linux