Re: [PATCH] 9p: Fix initialisation of netfs_inode for 9p

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Would it make sense to just always update netfs's ctx->remote_i_size in
> the various stat2inode calls instead?

Yeah, that's probably a good idea.

David

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-cachefs+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx.




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]
  Powered by Linux