On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:11:25PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:08:37AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > Well, I am not sure if FMODE_FAKE_PATH in v3 is a better name, > > because you did rightfully say that "fake path" is not that descriptive, > > but I will think of a better way to describe "fake path" and match the > > flag to the file container name. > > I suspect the just claling it out what it is and naming it > FMODE_OVERLAYFS might be a good idea. We'd just need to make sure not > to set it for the cachefiles use case, which is probably a good idea > anyway. Adding Dave: not sure if I'm missing something, but is there any good reason cachefs doesn't juse use dentry_open() ? -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
