Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -/* > - * Prepare a read operation, shortening it to a cached/uncached > - * boundary as appropriate. > - */ > -static enum netfs_io_source cachefiles_prepare_read(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq, > - loff_t i_size) > +static inline enum netfs_io_source > +cachefiles_do_prepare_read(struct netfs_cache_resources *cres, > + loff_t start, size_t *_len, loff_t i_size, > + unsigned long *_flags) That's not exactly what I meant, but I guess it would work as the compiler would probably inline it into both callers. > - __entry->netfs_inode, __entry->cache_inode) > + __entry->cache_inode) Can you not lose the netfs_inode number from the tracepoint, please? Feel free to display 0 there for your purposes. David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
