Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Would it be possible to make readahead_count() do: > > > > return rac->_nr_pages - rac->_batch_count; > > > > maybe? > > Yes, I think that would make sense. Do we also need to change > readhead_length()? It seems to me that it's only ever called once at > initialisation, so it should be possible to keep the two in sync. > Can you write & test such a patch? I'll support it going upstream > (either by taking it myself or giving you a R-b to take it through your > tree). It seems I also have a problem with readahead_index() needing compensation too. I'm guessing that's more of a problem, however, as I think that's expected to refer to the beginning of the current batch. David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
