On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:56:49PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It's still reproducible on the latest next-20210107 tree with below > > > reproducer. > > > > If you meant next-20220107 then that's using the v4 version of the patches; > > there is a v5, though I've only posted an updated cifs patch, that is in > > next-20220110. I'm not sure if it would help, though. > > I managed to set up and run cthon04. I can confirm that it throws out lots of > oopses with fscache-rewrite-v4 (see below for an example of such): > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/tag/?h=fscache-rewrite-v4 > > but seems to work fine with v5: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=fscache-rewrite > > both with and without a cache attached. > Ya, 0110 tree passed all tests. Thank you David! Murphy -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
