Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Probably, this patch should be merged with #38. The commit logs are the > same, and they are at least somewhat related. That's not so simple, unfortunately. Patch 46 requires bits of patches 43 and 45 in addition to patch 38 and patch 39 depends on patch 38. David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
