Re: [RFC 09/19] netfs: refactor netfs_rreq_unlock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/11/21 1:23 PM, JeffleXu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/10/21 11:41 PM, David Howells wrote:
>> Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> In demand-read case, the input folio of netfs API is may not the page
>>
>> "is may not the page"?  I think you're missing a verb (and you have too many
>> auxiliary verbs;-)
>>
> 
> Sorry for my poor English... What I want to express is that
> 
> "In demand-read case, the input folio of netfs API may not be the page
> cache inside the address space of the netfs file."
> 

By the way, can we change the current address_space based netfs API to
folio-based, which shall be more general? That is, the current
implementation of netfs API uses (address_space, page_offset, len) tuple
to describe the destination where the read data shall be store into.
While in the demand-read case, the input folio may not be the page
cache, and thus there's no address_space attached with it.

-- 
Thanks,
Jeffle

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]
  Powered by Linux