[PATCH 03/12] cachefiles: Use file_inode() rather than accessing ->f_inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Use the file_inode() helper rather than accessing ->f_inode directly.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/cachefiles/io.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/io.c b/fs/cachefiles/io.c
index ca68bb97ca00..fac2e8e7b533 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/io.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/io.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int cachefiles_read(struct netfs_cache_resources *cres,
 
 	_enter("%pD,%li,%llx,%zx/%llx",
 	       file, file_inode(file)->i_ino, start_pos, len,
-	       i_size_read(file->f_inode));
+	       i_size_read(file_inode(file)));
 
 	/* If the caller asked us to seek for data before doing the read, then
 	 * we should do that now.  If we find a gap, we fill it with zeros.
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int cachefiles_write(struct netfs_cache_resources *cres,
 
 	_enter("%pD,%li,%llx,%zx/%llx",
 	       file, file_inode(file)->i_ino, start_pos, len,
-	       i_size_read(file->f_inode));
+	       i_size_read(file_inode(file)));
 
 	ki = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cachefiles_kiocb), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ki)


--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]
  Powered by Linux