Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But I've no objection to using ktime_get_real_seconds() and truncating the > > value. > > Ok, fair enough. I was mainly worried about what might happen when the > file names stop being strictly sorted in numerical order by their creation > time. If that is not a problem, I'll send the simpler patch to use > lower_32_bits(ktime_get_real_seconds()) for clarity. That's not a problem. Everything copied into that directory is to be deleted asap. David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
