Hi David,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:15 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> - int ret;
>> + int ret = 0;
>
> This isn't quite the right solution. The uninitialised error path needs to
> set -ENOBUFS.
That's what your commit 102f4d900c9c8f5e ("FS-Cache: Handle a write to the
page immediately beyond the EOF marker") does, and is also in its commit
description:
Whilst we're at it, change the triggered assertion in CacheFiles to just
return -ENOBUFS instead.
"ret" is used only to print the original error in a debug message.
> Unfortunately, my compiler doesn't show a warning:-/
Need old gcc (4.1.2 ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
