Re: "errno 95" ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Brown <ajb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> CacheFiles bind failed: errno 95 (Operation not supported)
> 
> It seemed to be a SElinux error, but selinux is disabled.

There are a number of things it could mean:

 (1) The daemon wrote more than a page of data to the module control fd.

 (2) There was an unexpected or unparseable command passed to the module
     control fd.

 (3) The backing filesystem inodes don't support a necessary function:

 (4) The backing filesystem block size is >PAGE_SIZE.

You can also get it if the backing filesystem doesn't support user xattrs.
This is the most likely cause - but if that happens you should get a line in
the kernel log.

David

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]
  Powered by Linux