On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:08:21 +0530 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > The below patch which was first posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/3/193 > > and tested by me and picked up by the maintainer here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/1/57 > > But it seems to not to have made to the linux-next or Linus tree. > I'm resending what it seems like a lost patch. > > > From: Justin Lecher <jlec@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Support the caching of large files. > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31182 > > Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c > index 0e3c092..d136686 100644 > --- a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c > +++ b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c > @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ int cachefiles_write_page(struct fscache_storage *op, struct page *page) > dget(object->backer); > mntget(cache->mnt); > file = dentry_open(object->backer, cache->mnt, O_RDWR, > - cache->cache_cred); > + (O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE), cache->cache_cred); Doesn't compile. How extensively was this change tested? Please describe the testing which was performed? -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
