On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:05 PM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mark Moseley <moseleymark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Nope, it wasn't. I had to reboot it back into the previous kernel for
>> the weekend. I got a couple of oops though in the past 12 hours. I
>> unfortunately hadn't fired up that dump again though (I have now and
>> will send a new dump when I get another crash)
>
> Okay. I'm away next week at a pair of conferences, but I'll try and have a
> look.
>
>> [67666.389761] kernel BUG at fs/fscache/operation.c:426!
>
> Can you have a look what's on line 426 for you, please? It's a blank line in
> my kernel. I think I've managed to rearrange my patches to muck the ordering
> up.
Here's line 426 with some context:
418 _debug("PUT OP");
419
420 if (op->state != FSCACHE_OP_ST_COMPLETE &&
421 op->state != FSCACHE_OP_ST_CANCELLED)
422 printk("FS-Cache: Asserting on %s operation\n",
423 fscache_op_names[op->name]);
424
425 ASSERTIFCMP(op->state != FSCACHE_OP_ST_COMPLETE,
426 op->state, ==, FSCACHE_OP_ST_CANCELLED);
427 op->state = FSCACHE_OP_ST_DEAD;
428
429 fscache_stat(&fscache_n_op_release);
430
431 if (op->release) {
432 op->release(op);
433 op->release = NULL;
434 }
435
436 object = op->object;
437
--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
