On 07/23/2010 02:05 PM, Stef Bon wrote: > In my opinion there should be article published about this, describing > fs-cache generally, and these kinds of benchmarks! FS-Cache is nicely documented on Documentation/filesystems/caching/fscache.txt present in the kernel source. IIRC, LWN - http://lwn.net/ had published a couple of articles about FS-Cache. I agree that there is little information available about the use-cases and benchmarks. What do you mean exactly by article? More blog entries or article in magazines or whitepaper sort? Which one do you think has a good chance of reaching the target audience? Thanks, > Using fs-cache for network filesystem is an important issue, and > should get "exposure". > > Stef Bon > > 2010/7/23 Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On 2010-07-22, at 11:40, David Howells wrote: >>> Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> As it can been seen, the performance while reading when data is cache >>>> hot (disk) is not great as the network link is a Gigabit ethernet (with >>>> server having working set in memory) which is mostly expected. >>> >>> That's what I see with NFS and AFS too. >>> >>>> (I could not get access to a slower network (say 100 Mb/s) where the real >>>> performance boost could be evident). >> >> More interesting than a slow network is testing with more clients. 10 clients should be able to get 10x the read performance from the client-local cache, probably more than the server's peak disk/network bandwidth. >> -- Suresh Jayaraman -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
