SV: cachefiles_

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Add. info:
Linux nas 2.6.31-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 23 10:03:24 CEST 2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
kernel26 2.6.31.5-1
Cachefiles 0.9
nfs-utils 1.2.0-4

When looking at iostat it is obvious that the write-pipe to the SSD is unable to keep up with the reads, and when it grows too large the below happens. 20 parallel reads of 100MB files work, but 40 does not.

Kind regards,
Fredrik Widlund

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: linux-cachefs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cachefs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] För Fredrik Widlund
Skickat: den 2 november 2009 14:57
Till: linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
Ämne:  cachefiles_


Hi

I'm evaluation using cachefiles in a production environment. Is this considered a nono? I tried benching it quickly but ran into the below when mounting an NFS share through localhost. Below I have 100 processes reading 100 different files with dd.

Kind regards,
Fredrik Widlund

Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: INFO: task dd:1927 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: dd            D 0000000000000000     0  1927      1 0x00000004
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: ffff88012ee79a80 0000000000000082 ffff88012ee79a80 000000001dde118e
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: 00000000000138c0 ffff88012f84cf80 ffff88012ee79d20 00000000000138c0
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: 000000000000e168 ffff88012ee79d20 ffff88012ee79a80 0000000000011280
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: Call Trace:
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffffa041adb5>] ? __fscache_wait_on_page_write+0x75/0xc0 [fscache]
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff8107a130>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffffa0477b7f>] ? nfs_fscache_release_page+0x6f/0x160 [nfs]
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810ee0d2>] ? shrink_page_list+0x512/0x850
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff811cb90a>] ? generic_make_request+0x1fa/0x500
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810ec8ce>] ? isolate_pages_global+0xce/0x240
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff811cbcc5>] ? submit_bio+0xb5/0x170
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810ee726>] ? shrink_list+0x316/0x710
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810eed9d>] ? shrink_zone+0x27d/0x3a0
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810efe61>] ? try_to_free_pages+0x271/0x410
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810ec800>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x240
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810e7359>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x429/0x640
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff8138545c>] ? io_schedule+0x8c/0xd0
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810ea213>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0x123/0x2b0
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810ea3cc>] ? ra_submit+0x2c/0x50
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff810e23e9>] ? generic_file_aio_read+0x369/0x640
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff8111f502>] ? do_sync_read+0xf2/0x150
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff8107a130>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff81120541>] ? vfs_read+0xe1/0x1d0
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff8112074e>] ? sys_read+0x5e/0xb0
Nov  2 14:37:49 nas kernel: [<ffffffff8100c382>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs


--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]
  Powered by Linux