Joshua Levine <spamjoshua@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (gdb) list *fscache_object_slow_work_execute+0x755 > > No symbol "fscache_object_slow_work_execute" in current context. Did you build fscache as a module? Can you build it in instead? > I am not sure this helps, but I also note that the cachefs usage and the > errors seem to correspond to a significant increase in acpi interrupts. I can't think how it would - unless ACPI is emulating your disk somehow. David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
