Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.30-test #7
> -------------------------------------------------------
> swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&cwq->lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01519f3>] __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&q->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c012cc9c>] __wake_up+0x26/0x5c
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
Okay. I think I understand this:
(1) cachefiles_read_waiter() intercepts wake up events, and, as such, is run
inside the waitqueue spinlock for the page bit waitqueue.
(2) cachefiles_read_waiter() calls fscache_enqueue_retrieval() which calls
fscache_enqueue_operation() which calls schedule_work() for fast
operations, thus taking a per-CPU workqueue spinlock.
(3) queue_work(), which is called by many things, calls __queue_work(), which
takes the per-CPU workqueue spinlock.
(4) __queue_work() then calls insert_work(), which calls wake_up(), which
takes the waitqueue spinlock for the per-CPU workqueue waitqueue.
Even though the two waitqueues are separate, I think lockdep sees them as
having the same lock.
Ingo: Is there any way around this?
David
---
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&q->lock){-.-.-.}:
> [<c0168746>] __lock_acquire+0xfd6/0x12d5
> [<c0168afc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> [<c03d1249>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x5e
> [<c012cc9c>] __wake_up+0x26/0x5c
> [<c0151053>] insert_work+0x7b/0x95
> [<c0151a02>] __queue_work+0x2e/0x4e
> [<c0151a5e>] delayed_work_timer_fn+0x3c/0x4f
> [<c014925b>] run_timer_softirq+0x180/0x206
> [<c01445cb>] __do_softirq+0xc3/0x18d
> [<c01446d9>] do_softirq+0x44/0x7a
> [<c0144823>] irq_exit+0x43/0x87
> [<c0117cbd>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7c/0x9b
> [<c0103956>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x40
> [<c0101ed0>] cpu_idle+0xa2/0xbe
> [<c03bcef6>] rest_init+0x66/0x79
> [<c0537a98>] start_kernel+0x396/0x3ae
> [<c053707f>] __init_begin+0x7f/0x98
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #0 (&cwq->lock){-.-...}:
> [<c0168496>] __lock_acquire+0xd26/0x12d5
> [<c0168afc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> [<c03d1249>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x5e
> [<c01519f3>] __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c0151ab9>] queue_work_on+0x48/0x63
> [<c0151c1d>] queue_work+0x23/0x38
> [<c0151c50>] schedule_work+0x1e/0x31
> [<f7f9ed69>] fscache_enqueue_operation+0xc5/0x102 [fscache]
> [<f80b6142>] cachefiles_read_waiter+0xb3/0xcd [cachefiles]
> [<c01292ae>] __wake_up_common+0x4c/0x85
> [<c012ccae>] __wake_up+0x38/0x5c
> [<c015568f>] __wake_up_bit+0x34/0x4b
> [<c01ad459>] unlock_page+0x55/0x6a
> [<c020fb6b>] mpage_end_io_read+0x4e/0x71
> [<c020a4da>] bio_endio+0x31/0x44
> [<c027759c>] req_bio_endio+0xab/0xde
> [<c027774c>] blk_update_request+0x17d/0x321
> [<c0277912>] blk_update_bidi_request+0x22/0x62
> [<c02792c4>] blk_end_bidi_request+0x25/0x6e
> [<c0279371>] blk_end_request+0x1a/0x30
> [<f82811da>] scsi_io_completion+0x193/0x3bb [scsi_mod]
> [<f827a888>] scsi_finish_command+0xd9/0xf2 [scsi_mod]
> [<f8281522>] scsi_softirq_done+0xf4/0x10d [scsi_mod]
> [<c027fcdf>] blk_done_softirq+0x6f/0x8e
> [<c01445cb>] __do_softirq+0xc3/0x18d
> [<c01446d9>] do_softirq+0x44/0x7a
> [<c0144823>] irq_exit+0x43/0x87
> [<c01049fd>] do_IRQ+0x8d/0xb2
> [<c0103595>] common_interrupt+0x35/0x40
> [<c0101ed0>] cpu_idle+0xa2/0xbe
> [<c03bcef6>] rest_init+0x66/0x79
> [<c0537a98>] start_kernel+0x396/0x3ae
> [<c053707f>] __init_begin+0x7f/0x98
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> 1 lock held by swapper/0:
> #0: (&q->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c012cc9c>] __wake_up+0x26/0x5c
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.30-test #7
> Call Trace:
> [<c03cde42>] ? printk+0x1d/0x33
> [<c0167349>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xaf/0xcb
> [<c0168496>] __lock_acquire+0xd26/0x12d5
> [<c01519f3>] ? __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c0168afc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> [<c01519f3>] ? __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c01519f3>] ? __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c03d1249>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x5e
> [<c01519f3>] ? __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c01519f3>] __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c0151ab9>] queue_work_on+0x48/0x63
> [<c0151c1d>] queue_work+0x23/0x38
> [<c0151c50>] schedule_work+0x1e/0x31
> [<f7f9ed69>] fscache_enqueue_operation+0xc5/0x102 [fscache]
> [<f80b6142>] cachefiles_read_waiter+0xb3/0xcd [cachefiles]
> [<c01292ae>] __wake_up_common+0x4c/0x85
> [<c012ccae>] __wake_up+0x38/0x5c
> [<c015568f>] __wake_up_bit+0x34/0x4b
> [<c01ad459>] unlock_page+0x55/0x6a
> [<c020fb6b>] mpage_end_io_read+0x4e/0x71
> [<c020a4da>] bio_endio+0x31/0x44
> [<c027759c>] req_bio_endio+0xab/0xde
> [<c027774c>] blk_update_request+0x17d/0x321
> [<c0277912>] blk_update_bidi_request+0x22/0x62
> [<c02792c4>] blk_end_bidi_request+0x25/0x6e
> [<c0279371>] blk_end_request+0x1a/0x30
> [<f82811da>] scsi_io_completion+0x193/0x3bb [scsi_mod]
> [<c0166b5b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x19/0x2c
> [<f8280f43>] ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x92/0xaa [scsi_mod]
> [<f827a888>] scsi_finish_command+0xd9/0xf2 [scsi_mod]
> [<f8281522>] scsi_softirq_done+0xf4/0x10d [scsi_mod]
> [<c027fcdf>] blk_done_softirq+0x6f/0x8e
> [<c01445cb>] __do_softirq+0xc3/0x18d
> [<c01446d9>] do_softirq+0x44/0x7a
> [<c0144823>] irq_exit+0x43/0x87
> [<c01049fd>] do_IRQ+0x8d/0xb2
> [<c0103595>] common_interrupt+0x35/0x40
> [<c0109860>] ? mwait_idle+0x98/0xec
> [<c0101ed0>] cpu_idle+0xa2/0xbe
> [<c03bcef6>] rest_init+0x66/0x79
> [<c0537a98>] start_kernel+0x396/0x3ae
> [<c053707f>] __init_begin+0x7f/0x98
--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
