Re: Cachefs fails to take effect on nfs4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's unclear - it seems like all settings EXCEPT fsc are being
propagated to the submounts, so...
Compare:
manticore.acm.jhu.edu:/scratch /scratch nfs4
rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,nointr,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=128.220.70.71,fsc,addr=128.220.70.62
0 0
manticore.acm.jhu.edu:/scratch/rercola /scratch/rercola nfs4
rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,nointr,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=128.220.70.71,addr=128.220.70.62
0 0

- Rich

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rince <rincebrain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Oh look.
>> v4 80dc463e  801 0:25    c8654208da0d3669  yes
>> v4 80dc463e  801 0:29    c2802708a327444c  no
>
> That answers that, then.  The fsc option isn't being propagated to submounts.
>
> The question is: should it be?  Or should it be done via some out-of-band way
> of configuring this?  The latter is on my to-do list anyway for finer grained
> control.
>
> David
>
> --
> Linux-cachefs mailing list
> Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
>



-- 

I need to discuss BUY-BACK PROVISIONS with at least six studio SLEAZEBALLS!!

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]
  Powered by Linux