alessandro salvatori <sandr8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > but that hit a few removed files and a few failed hunks. I am tempted to > wiggle around the rejected hunks and give it a try but perhaps it's better > if I just get the right refpoint from git... Hopefully I'll be in a better position to release a new set of patches after the upcoming patch melee (linux-2.6.26 was released yesterday). > Before I go and learn how to checkout with git... I was just wondering, is > this a deliberate choice to provide a patchset against a particular git > commit, as to keep away the vast public from these patches and not expose > them to possibly unstable code? The main choice of GIT tree to follow is what Andrew Morton wants me to use as a base. At the moment the priority is getting the patches upstream. David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
