Wilhelm Meier <wilhelm.meier@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > is there a usable cachefs-backend (not cachefilesd) implementation? > Any hints? Usable? Not really. There's CacheFS, but it needs some work to bring it up to date. It's on my todo list, but it's below fixing FS-Cache to avoid sleeping in rpciod - and that's proving to be 'interesting'. David
