On Mon, 6 March 2006 11:55:54 +0000, David Howells wrote: > > > The kernel won't compile with just patch #1 applied. Patches shouldn't go > > into git in that manner. > > It's easier to review them in that manner. If you don't think git is up to it, > then combine them. Funny, I would have assumed that all patches should leave the kernel in a state where it'd at least compile and boot. Since when are patches split for review an accepted exception? Jörn -- More computing sins are committed in the name of efficiency (without necessarily achieving it) than for any other single reason - including blind stupidity. -- W. A. Wulf