-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/08/2004 08:22 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Clemens Schwaighofer wrote: > >> brr :) why is it posix, this is so out of the context for me (as a >> user). Is it possible to have a cachefs flag. Would make it more logical. > > > Because it was the easiest way to get things started (i.e. no userlevel > changes needed at all).... The 'fscache' flag will be coming along with > the nfs4 support, since nfs4 mounting code does not have an open > (unused) mounting flag.... okay, thank you for the information. Anyway inbetween I will try that out with NFS3 ... lg, clemens -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBZrTAjBz/yQjBxz8RAoddAJwIVyxuMFy0tD9H8z8D/UKjXmvAtgCg4mcY 2NZyYRCsdR6CzbTKKcJiybw= =sKPN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
