On 6/28/07, Ranjan Sinha <rnjn.sinha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for this discussion, since this really gets confusing at times.
> >
> > struct xxx {
> > __be32 pdu_cnt:6;
> > __be32 y:3;
> > __be32 wep_key:2;
> > __be32 uses_wep_key:1;
> > __be32 keep_alive:1;
> > __be32 buff_tail_addr:19;
> >
> > __be32 cts_11g:1;
> > __be32 rts_11g:1;
> > __be32 x:2;
> > __be32 frag_size:12;
> > __be32 payload_len:12;
> > __be32 frag_num:4;
> > }
>
> this isn't safe if you want to mimic hardware layout; the order of the
> bits in the struct is different for little endian and big endian
> machines...
>
What is the best way in such scenario? Should we then use an unsigned
char array and then keep separate mappings of each bit for little and
big endian machines ?
I am sorry I still can't figure out how to use bits shift and make it
can be portability to any Be or Le endian machine. what I can tell you
is if the bits fields was define for Be, and if the host is Le, so you
just need reverse the order of bits field and it will work well. For
example:
That a specs define for Be:
Descriptor(big endian) size offset
RTS 1 0
multicast 1 1
x 15 2
y 15 17
If you want define it in Le host, we can define it like this
struct desc {
y:15;
x:15;
muticast:1;
rts:1;
} __attribute__ ((packed));
That only my personal opinion, CMIIW. if anyone know better method,
please share with us. thanks!
BR
lyb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-c-programming" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
