On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 07:03:06AM -1000, Chris Worley wrote: > So one is pre-flush and the second is FUA? How do you tell which F > you're looking at if just one? I'm seeing lots of both FWS and FWFSM. A Pre-flush is before the 'W', a FUA is after the 'W'. > So, really no effect, just informational (this is an XFS fs doing the I/O). Yes. > > Any hints on when sync, flushes, or FUAs force flash to write to > media? We're using NVMe drives. All these operations should be > power-cut safe... I'm not sure if any force the driver/controller to > commit to NAND when buffering (in power-cut safe memory) would be > better for performance/lifespan. I'm guessing this isn't an easy > question... any idea how to find out? The answer is it depends. For enterprice drivers writes are usually buffered on SRAM before going to the media, but those usually don't even claim to have a volatile write cache (e.g. do not set the Volatile Write Cache (VWC) bit in Identify Controller in nvme, you can check that using 'nvme id-ctrl -H /dev/nvme0'). For consumer drivers chances are every flush or fua will go out to the media, or the device is not actually power fail safe. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
