On Thu, Feb 19 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 04:55:39PM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since I last posted this pair of patches, I've done some extensive > > updating of the kernel patch, so it should now be happy to compile > > under all possible Kconfigs (fingers crossed) and also its a fair > > bit cleaner too. > > > > I'm adding the linux-btrace list, since I didn't know about that > > list when I made the initial posting. > > > > Since there is probably more GFS2 changes than blktrace changes, I > > could push this through the GFS2 tree. Let me know if you'd prefer > > it to go via the blktrace tree. I'd like to be able to push this > > in at the next merge window if possible. This patch is against the > > head of the GFS2 -nmw git tree (obviously that makes no difference > > to the blktrace side of the patch). > > > > An updated blktrace userland patch follows in the next email, although > > the changes from the last version are fairly minor, > > Umm, why would you put fs internal stuff into blktrace? Just use > the generic ringbuffer directly and trace into that one. Agree, some months ago this would have made more sense, since it was easy to just piggy back on top of blktrace. But now tracing is easily available, so going that route makes more sense now. Especially since this lock tracking doesn't need much of what blkparse offers anyway. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
