On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:47 -0400, Alan D. Brunelle wrote: > Hm, again, if the blktrace | blkiomon (direct, no blkparse) is how you > do things, no, it's blktrace | blkparse | blkiomon Isn't blkparse needed to sort all those per-CPU traces by time? I want this feature. > I would think that it would /not/ take all that much > processing power to parse character strings. Anyway, it's more expensive. > (I've heard that IBM makes some pretty fast processors... :-) ) Sure. But we don't make our money from wasting their CPU power :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
