On Fri, Jan 11 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > ktime_get() should have been used instead, which is a proper GTOD > > clocksource. The patch below implements this. > > Will give it a whirl, it looks promising indeed and gets rid of the ugly > cpu sync stuff. What is the cost of ktime_get() compared to > sched_clock()? Works for me - will apply it right now, we can always evaluate any potential performance impact later. It's more important to have a functional blktrace in 2.6.24. Thanks Ingo! -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
