Re: [patch] block: fix blktrace timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Correction: it was not a high res time source, it was "the 
> > scheduler's per-cpu, non-exported, non-coherent, 
> > warps-and-jumps-like-hell high-res timesource that was intentionally 
> > called the _sched_ clock" ;-)
> 
> I think the warts of cpu_clock() are fixable, except maybe 
> unsynchronization on SMP which is harder.

yes - but in terms of v2.6.24, the bkltrace patch i sent is a lot less 
risky.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux