Hi. Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10 2008, David Dillow wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:44 +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote: >>> David Dillow <dillowda@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> At the moment, I'm not sure how to track this farther, or how to fix it >>>> properly. Any advice would be appreciated. >>> Just out of curiosity, could you try the appended cumulative patch and >>> report .clock_warps, .clock_overflows and .clock_underflows as you did. >> With those patches, CONFIG_NO_HZ works just fine. Could these patches also help with hibernation issues? I'm trying x86_64+NO_HZ, and seeing activity delayed during the atomic copy and afterwards until I manually generate interrupts (by pressing keys). Regards, Nigel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
