Re: [PATCH] Add btrecord/btreplay capability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> This looks pretty nifty and useful. I've applied both your patches. They
> do have a few build warnings here, involving fatal():
>
> btrecord.c: In function 'stream_open':
> btrecord.c:685: warning: the address of 'ofile_name' will always
> evaluate as 'true'
> btrecord.c:704: warning: the address of 'vfile_name' will always
> evaluate as 'true'
>
> btreplay.c: In function 'tip_init':
> btreplay.c:783: warning: the address of 'fn' will always evaluate as
> 'true'
> btreplay.c: In function 'replay_sub':
> btreplay.c:1314: warning: the address of 'path' will always evaluate as
> 'true'
>
>   
Hi Jens -

Thanks for taking these in - I have no idea why I'm not seeing that
here, it builds clean on ia64 (SLES10/gcc=4.1.0) and x86_64
(Ubuntu/gcc=4.1.2).

I see why the warnings come out, and will think of a way to clean that up.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux