Hi Luiz, On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 at 03:58, Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Archie, > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 1:47 AM Archie Pusaka <apusaka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Currently, we don't update the name resolving cache when receiving > > a name resolve event if the discovery phase is not in the resolving > > stage. > > > > However, if the user connect to a device while we are still resolving > > remote name for another device, discovery will be stopped, and because > > we are no longer in the discovery resolving phase, the corresponding > > remote name event will be ignored, and thus the device being resolved > > will stuck in NAME_PENDING state. > > > > If discovery is then restarted and then stopped, this will cause us to > > try cancelling the name resolve of the same device again, which is > > incorrect and might upset the controller. > > Please add the Fixes tag. Unfortunately I don't know when was the issue introduced, I don't even know whether this is a recent issue or an old one. Looking back, this part of the code has stayed this way since 2012. Do I still need to add the fixes tag? If so, does it have to be accurate? > > > Signed-off-by: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Ying Hsu <yinghsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > The following steps are performed: > > (1) Prepare 2 classic peer devices that needs RNR. Put device A > > closer to DUT and device B (much) farther from DUT. > > (2) Remove all cache and previous connection from DUT > > (3) Put both peers into pairing mode, then start scanning on DUT > > (4) After ~8 sec, turn off peer B. > > *This is done so DUT can discover peer B (discovery time is 10s), > > but it hasn't started RNR. Peer is turned off to buy us the max > > time in the RNR phase (5s). > > (5) Immediately as device A is shown on UI, click to connect. > > *We thus know that the DUT is in the RNR phase and trying to > > resolve the name of peer B when we initiate connection to peer A. > > (6) Forget peer A. > > (7) Restart scan and stop scan. > > *Before the CL, stop scan is broken because we will try to cancel > > a nonexistent RNR > > (8) Restart scan again. Observe DUT can scan normally. > > > > > > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 17 ++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > index 395c6479456f..95e145e278c9 100644 > > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > @@ -2453,6 +2453,16 @@ static void hci_check_pending_name(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, > > !test_and_set_bit(HCI_CONN_MGMT_CONNECTED, &conn->flags)) > > mgmt_device_connected(hdev, conn, name, name_len); > > > > + e = hci_inquiry_cache_lookup_resolve(hdev, bdaddr, NAME_PENDING); > > + > > + if (e) { > > + list_del(&e->list); > > + > > + e->name_state = name ? NAME_KNOWN : NAME_NOT_KNOWN; > > + mgmt_remote_name(hdev, bdaddr, ACL_LINK, 0x00, e->data.rssi, > > + name, name_len); > > + } > > + > > if (discov->state == DISCOVERY_STOPPED) > > return; > > > > @@ -2462,7 +2472,6 @@ static void hci_check_pending_name(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, > > if (discov->state != DISCOVERY_RESOLVING) > > return; > > > > - e = hci_inquiry_cache_lookup_resolve(hdev, bdaddr, NAME_PENDING); > > /* If the device was not found in a list of found devices names of which > > * are pending. there is no need to continue resolving a next name as it > > * will be done upon receiving another Remote Name Request Complete > > @@ -2470,12 +2479,6 @@ static void hci_check_pending_name(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, > > if (!e) > > return; > > > > - list_del(&e->list); > > - > > - e->name_state = name ? NAME_KNOWN : NAME_NOT_KNOWN; > > - mgmt_remote_name(hdev, bdaddr, ACL_LINK, 0x00, e->data.rssi, > > - name, name_len); > > - > > if (hci_resolve_next_name(hdev)) > > return; > > > > -- > > 2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog > > > > > -- > Luiz Augusto von Dentz Thanks, Archie