Hi Jakub,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 5:19 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:09:33 -0700 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > > I see two new sparse warnings (for a follow up):
> > >
> > > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:3789:26: warning: cast to restricted __le16
> > > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:3791:26: warning: cast to restricted __le16
> >
> > Crap, let me fix them.
>
> Do you mean i should hold off with pushing or you'll follow up?
Ive just fixup the original patch that introduced it, btw how do you
run sparse to capture such errors?
> > > Two bad Fixes tags:
> > >
> > > Commit: 68253f3cd715 ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix resuming scan after suspend resume")
> > > Fixes tag: Fixes: 3b42055388c30 (Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix attempting to suspend with
> > > Has these problem(s):
> > > - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
> > > Commit: 9111786492f1 ("Bluetooth: fix an error code in hci_register_dev()")
> > > Fixes tag: Fixes: d6bb2a91f95b ("Bluetooth: Unregister suspend with userchannel")
> > > Has these problem(s):
> > > - Target SHA1 does not exist
> > >
> > > And a whole bunch of patches committed by you but signed off by Marcel.
> > > Last time we tried to fix that it ended up making things worse.
> > > So I guess it is what it is :) Pulling...
> >
> > Yep, that happens when I rebase on top of net-next so I would have to
> > redo all the Signed-off-by lines if the patches were originally
> > applied by Marcel, at least I don't know of any option to keep the
> > original committer while rebasing?
>
> I think the most common way is to avoid rebasing. Do you rebase to get
> rid of revised patches or such?
So we don't need to rebase? There were some patches already applied
via bluetooth.git so at least I do it to remove them and any possible
conflicts if there were changes introduced to the bluetooth
directories that can eventually come from some other tree.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
