Hi Sean, On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:15 PM <bluez.test.bot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! > > Dear submitter, > > Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. > This is a CI test results with your patch series: > PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=659440 > > ---Test result--- > > Test Summary: > CheckPatch PASS 1.02 seconds > GitLint PASS 0.45 seconds > SubjectPrefix PASS 0.33 seconds > BuildKernel PASS 41.55 seconds > BuildKernel32 PASS 37.70 seconds > Incremental Build with patchesPASS 49.91 seconds > TestRunner: Setup PASS 620.74 seconds > TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 20.09 seconds > TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 7.29 seconds > TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 122.23 seconds > TestRunner: rfcomm-tester PASS 11.24 seconds > TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 10.85 seconds > TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 11.16 seconds > TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 7.91 seconds > > > > --- > Regards, > Linux Bluetooth Need more context to be able to merge this, why are you using usb_autopm_get_interface/usb_autopm_put_interface and shouldn't that be generalized if that is required to handle suspend properly? -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz
