This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=639253 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch FAIL 12.99 seconds GitLint PASS 7.20 seconds Prep - Setup ELL PASS 40.08 seconds Build - Prep PASS 0.70 seconds Build - Configure PASS 8.26 seconds Build - Make PASS 1347.34 seconds Make Check PASS 11.18 seconds Make Check w/Valgrind PASS 407.45 seconds Make Distcheck PASS 217.19 seconds Build w/ext ELL - Configure PASS 8.40 seconds Build w/ext ELL - Make PASS 1337.26 seconds Incremental Build with patchesPASS 9576.02 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - FAIL Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf Output: [v2,BlueZ,6/7] tools: Add isotest tool WARNING:PREFER_FALLTHROUGH: Prefer 'fallthrough;' over fallthrough comment #1222: FILE: tools/isotest.c:1106: + /* fall through */ /github/workspace/src/12841684.patch total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1219 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. /github/workspace/src/12841684.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: Ignored message types: COMMIT_MESSAGE COMPLEX_MACRO CONST_STRUCT FILE_PATH_CHANGES MISSING_SIGN_OFF PREFER_PACKED SPDX_LICENSE_TAG SPLIT_STRING SSCANF_TO_KSTRTO NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth
