RE: [net-next,v3] net: SO_RCVMARK socket option for SO_MARK with recvmsg()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=636346

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      5.22 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      1.07 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 FAIL      0.90 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      31.48 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      27.89 seconds
Incremental Build with patchesPASS      38.28 seconds
TestRunner: Setup             PASS      470.72 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      17.48 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      6.24 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester       PASS      101.20 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     PASS      9.74 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      9.47 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      9.56 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      6.38 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: SubjectPrefix - FAIL - 0.90 seconds
Check subject contains "Bluetooth" prefix
"Bluetooth: " is not specified in the subject



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux