Re: Bluetooth: hci_core: Fix unbalanced unlock in set_device_flags()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 3/2/22 15:09, bluez.test.bot@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
> 
> Dear submitter,
> 
> Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
> This is a CI test results with your patch series:
> PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=619579
> 
> ---Test result---
> 
> Test Summary:
> CheckPatch                    PASS      1.68 seconds
> GitLint                       PASS      0.97 seconds
> SubjectPrefix                 PASS      0.85 seconds
> BuildKernel                   PASS      36.20 seconds
> BuildKernel32                 PASS      31.72 seconds
> Incremental Build with patchesPASS      43.70 seconds
> TestRunner: Setup             PASS      564.00 seconds
> TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      15.37 seconds
> TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      7.22 seconds
> TestRunner: mgmt-tester       PASS      117.53 seconds
> TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     FAIL      9.09 seconds
> TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      8.99 seconds
> TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      8.92 seconds
> TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      7.47 seconds
> 
> Details
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - FAIL - 9.09 seconds
> Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester
> Total: 10, Passed: 9 (90.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0
> 
> Failed Test Cases
> Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Write 32k Success       Failed       0.188 seconds

This seems like a false-positive failure, since I don't
see anyway how this patch can cause this issue.

Regards,

Hans




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux